Fieldfisher victorious in Court of Appeal for Sazerac in pivotal trade mark infringement case | Fieldfisher
Skip to main content
Press Release

Fieldfisher victorious in Court of Appeal for Sazerac in pivotal trade mark infringement case

06/08/2021
Image of the exterior of The Royal Courts of Justice in London, featuring Gothic architecture with intricate arches, pointed spires, and detailed carvings. The building's name is visibly inscribed on the wall along with a crest, illuminated by warm lighting from within.

Locations

United Kingdom

European law firm, Fieldfisher has successfully represented Sazerac Company, Inc., one of America’s oldest family owned, privately held distillers, in a landmark dispute over whether its trade mark had been infringed by Liverpool Gin Distillery, part of the Halewood Group.
 

On Thursday 5 August 2021, the Court of Appeal handed down its unanimous decision on Halewood International's appeal which sought to overturn a first instance decision of Justice Fancourt that their AMERICAN EAGLE sign infringed Sazerac Brands' EAGLE RARE trade mark.

In the first instance decision, it was held that AMERICAN EAGLE infringed the EAGLE RARE trade mark as there was a likelihood of 'indirect confusion' between the brands. 'Indirect confusion' arises in circumstances where consumers are confused by the origin of a particular brand, for example as they believe it is connected with another brand. This can be distinguished from 'direct confusion', which arises where consumers cannot tell the difference between the brands themselves and mistakenly believe they are one and the same.
 
Lord Justice Arnold rejected Halewood's appeal submission that there is a "special test" for assessing indirect confusion in the context of "brand extension" in the drinks industry where particular variants of well-known brands use similar names to indicate the same trade origin e.g. JACK DANIELS and GENTLEMAN JACK.
 
He ruled that the assessment of "likelihood of confusion" remains a multifactorial test on established legal principles and the first instance judge had applied the correct test to the particular facts of the case with no error of law or legal principle.
 
The judgment also addressed the scope of assessment when considering likelihood of confusion, confirming that it is perfectly acceptable to take into account evidence of future plans for further use of an infringing brand, including in situations where there is a likelihood of 'wrong-way-round' confusion and "swamping".
 
A Fieldfisher team led by Co-head of IP John Linneker, Partner Harriet Seymour, Director Sheena Sheikh Brown and Senior Associate Fiona Waples acted for the successful claimant Sazerac Brands.
 
 
Commenting on the win, John Linneker, Co-head of IP at Fieldfisher said:
 
We are delighted at this excellent result for Sazerac and are very pleased that the Court of Appeal has confirmed the finding of trade mark infringement made by the first instance judge.
 

Areas of Expertise

Trade Marks and Brands

Related Work Areas

Food and Beverage